@InProceedings{Müller:2002_2,
      AUTHOR = {Müller, Stefan},
      TITLE = {The Morphology of German Particle Verbs: Solving the Bracketing Paradox},
      YEAR = {2002},
      BOOKTITLE = {Proceedings of the HPSG-2001 Conference, Norwegian University of Science andTechnology, August 3-5},
      PAGES = {247-266},
      EDITOR = {Van Eynde, Frank and Hellan, Lars and Beermann, Dorothee},
      ADDRESS = {Trondheim},
      PUBLISHER = {CSLI Publications},
      URL = {http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/HPSG/2/Mueller-pn.pdf http://www.dfki.de/~stefan/PS/paradox.ps.gz http://www.dfki.de/~stefan/PS/paradox.pdf},
      ABSTRACT = {Inflectional affixes are sensitive to morphological properties of the elements they attachto. Therefore Bierwisch (1987) suggested that the inflectional material is combinedwith both the verbal stem of simplex verbs and the verbal stem of particle verbs. Heargued that this leads to the bracketing paradox in the case of particle verbs since thesemantic contribution of the inflectional information scopes over the semantic contri-bution of the complete particle verb. This paradox will be discussed in section 2.1.In section 2.2, I will discuss nominalizations and adjective derivation, which are alsoproblematic because of various bracketing paradoxes. In section 3 I will suggest a solu-tion to these apparent paradoxes that assumes that inflectional and derivational prefixesand suffixes always attach to a form of a stem that contains the information about a pos-sible particle already, but without containing a phonological realization of the particle.The particle is a dependent of the verb and is combined with its head after inflectionand derivation. With such an approach no rebracketing for the analysis of particle verbsmechanisms are necessary.},
      ANNOTE = {COLIURL : Muller:2002:MGP.pdf Muller:2002:MGP.ps}
}