%
% GENERATED FROM https://www.coli.uni-saarland.de
%    by   : anonymous
%    IP   : coli2006.lst.uni-saarland.de
%    at   : Mon, 05 Feb 2024 15:42:50 +0100 GMT
%    
% Selection : Reference #1695
%




@InProceedings{NV2005,
      AUTHOR = {van Noord, Gertjan and Kordoni, Valia},
      TITLE = {A Raising Analysis of the Dutch Passive},
      YEAR = {2005},
      BOOKTITLE = { The Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Department of Informatics, University of Lisbon, August 23-24, 2005},
      PAGES = {410-426},
      EDITOR = {Müller, Stefan},
      ADDRESS = {Stanford},
      PUBLISHER = {CSLI Publications},
      ABSTRACT = {This paper focuses on passive constructions in Dutch.
            Specifically, we focus on worden, as well as krijgen
            passives in Dutch, for which we propose a uniform, raising
            analysis in HPSG. We also show that such an analysis can be
            carried over to account for passives cross-linguistically.
            Specifically, we look at corresponding structures in German
            and show that there is no need for a dual raising and
            control analysis for the German ``agentive\'\' (werden) and
            the German ``dative\'\' (kriegen) passives, respectively, as
            has been proposed in Müller (2002) and Müller (2003)},
      NOTE = {ISSN 1535-1793}
}