%
% GENERATED FROM https://www.coli.uni-saarland.de
%    by   : anonymous
%    IP   : coli2006.lst.uni-saarland.de
%    at   : Mon, 05 Feb 2024 15:43:10 +0100 GMT
%    
% Selection : Author: Tibor_Kiss
%




@InProceedings{De Kuthy:1998,
      AUTHOR = {De Kuthy, Kordula},
      TITLE = {Splitting PP Arguments from NPs - An Argument Raising Approach and its Interaction with Lexical Semantics},
      YEAR = {1998},
      BOOKTITLE = {Workshop of the 10th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information (ESSLLI '98): Current Topics in Constraint-Based Germanic Syntax, August 17-28},
      PAGES = {49-64},
      EDITOR = {Kiss, Tibor and Meurers, Detmar},
      ADDRESS = {Saarbrücken, Germany},
      URL = {ftp://lt-ftp.dfki.uni-sb.de/pub/papers/local/De_Kuthy98c.ps.gz ftp://lt-ftp.dfki.uni-sb.de/pub/papers/local/De_Kuthy98c.entry},
      ANNOTE = {COLIURL : Kuthy:1998:SPA.pdf Kuthy:1998:SPA.ps}
}

@InCollection{Müller:2001,
      AUTHOR = {Müller, Stefan},
      TITLE = {Case in German - Towards an HPSG-Analysis},
      YEAR = {2001},
      BOOKTITLE = {Constraint-Based Approaches to Germanic Syntax},
      VOLUME = {7},
      PAGES = {217-255},
      EDITOR = {Kiss, Tibor and Meurers, Detmar},
      SERIES = {Studies in Constraint-Based Lexicalism},
      ADDRESS = {Stanford},
      PUBLISHER = {CSLI},
      URL = {http://www.dfki.de/~stefan/PS/csli-case.ps.gz},
      ABSTRACT = {In Tibor Kiss and Detmar Meurers (Eds): Constraint-based Approaches to Germanic Syntax, Studies in Constraint-Based Lexicalism, No. 7. Stanford: CSLI-Publications, pages 217-255. The case theory that is developed in the paper builds on work done by Heinz and Matiasek (1994). Their approach is improved in such a way that case assignent in coherent constructions like (1) works properly. (1) Er sieht den Mann den Wagen reparieren. he sees the manacc the caracc repair 'He sees the man repairing the car.' With the type hierarchy of Heinz and Matiasek it is impossible to describe the phenomenon Kongruenzkasus. Sentences like (2) and (3) cannot be analyzed. (2) a. Sie nannte ihn einen Lügner. She called himacc a liaracc b. Er wurde ein Lügner genannt. henom was a liarnom called 'He was called a liar.' (3) a. Ich sehe ihn als meinen Freund an. I see himacc as my friendacc PRFX 'I regard him as my friend.' b. Er wird als mein Freund angesehen. In the paper, I propose a more structured case feature and appropriate lexical entries to analyze these sentences. Apart from that it is explained how the case assignment in adjectival and participal environments works and the case assignment to non-realized subjects as in (4) will be explaind. (4) Ich habe den Männern erlaubt, einer nach dem anderen wegzulaufen.},
      ANNOTE = {COLIURL : Muller:2001:CGT.pdf Muller:2001:CGT.ps}
}

@InProceedings{Netter_et_al:1998,
      AUTHOR = {Netter, Klaus and Armstrong, Susan and Kiss, Tibor and Klein, Judith and Lehmann, Sabine and Milward, David and Regnier-Prost, Sylvie and Schäler, Reinhard and Wegst, Tillmann},
      TITLE = {DiET - Diagnostic and Evaluation Tools for Natural Language Application},
      YEAR = {1998},
      BOOKTITLE = {Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, May 28-30},
      PAGES = {573-579},
      ADDRESS = {Granada, Spain},
      URL = {ftp://lt-ftp.dfki.uni-sb.de/pub/papers/local/granada-diet.ps.gz ftp://lt-ftp.dfki.uni-sb.de/pub/papers/local/granada-diet.entry},
      ANNOTE = {COLIURL : Netter:1998:DDE.pdf Netter:1998:DDE.ps}
}