%
% GENERATED FROM https://www.coli.uni-saarland.de
%    by   : anonymous
%    IP   : coli2006.lst.uni-saarland.de
%    at   : Mon, 05 Feb 2024 15:42:21 +0100 GMT
%    
% Selection : Author: Gosse_Bouma
%




@InProceedings{Crysmann:1998,
      AUTHOR = {Crysmann, Berthold},
      TITLE = {Morphosyntactic Paradoxa in Fox: An Account in Linearization-Based Morphology},
      YEAR = {1998},
      BOOKTITLE = {Joint Conference on Formal Grammar, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Categorial Grammar},
      PAGES = {253-255},
      EDITOR = {Bouma, Gosse and Kruijff, Geert-Jan M. and Oehrle, Richard T.},
      ADDRESS = {Saarbrücken},
      URL = {https://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/~crysmann/papers/ESSLLI-98.ps https://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/~crysmann/papers/ESSLLI-98.pdf},
      ABSTRACT = {Paper presented at the Joint Conference on Formal, Head-driven and Categorial Grammar (FHCG '98) August 14-16, Saarbrücken in: Gosse Bouma, Richard Oehrle and Geert-Jan Kruijff, Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Formal Grammars, Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Categorial Grammar (FHCG '98), in Proceedings of the Tenth European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information (ESSLLI 10). A later version of this paper has been published in: Gosse Bouma, Erhard Hinrichs, Geert-Jan Kruijff, and Richard Oehrle (eds.) (1999) ``Constraints and Resources in Natural Language Syntax and Semantics'', Studies in Constraint-Based Lexicalism, CSLI Publications, Stanford. In this paper, I shall discuss an apparent paradox in the morphology and syntax of Fox (Mesquakie) complex verbs. In Fox, verbs can be modified by one or more of a variety of preverbs including modals, aspectuals, manner adverbials, numerals, quantifiers, as well as preverbs which increase the valence of the main verb (Dahlstrom, 1997a). While preverb and verb can be separated by words, phrases, or even embedded sentences, suggesting a status as syntactically independent words, in ection (cf. Dahlstrom, 1997a) and derivation (cf. Ackerman and LeSourd, 1994) appear to treat preverb-verb complexes as a single morphological unit. Following the basic assumptions of lexicalist syntax, I claim that Fox preverb-verb combinations are indeed morphologically derived and that inflectional affixes are attached to complex morphological objects in the word-formation component already. In order to account for the syntactic effects, I propose an analysis in Linearisation HPSG (Reape, 1994, Kathol, 1995), which builds on the assumption that Fox preverb-verb complexes introduce more than one domain object into syntax (cf. Kathol, 1996 for German, Crysmann, 1997 for European Portuguese). Further morphological material will then be distributed across preverb and verb by imposing partial morphological (order) constraints on PHON-values.},
      ANNOTE = {COLIURL : Crysmann:1998:MPF.pdf Crysmann:1998:MPF.ps}
}

@InCollection{Crysmann:1999_1,
      AUTHOR = {Crysmann, Berthold},
      TITLE = {Morphosyntactic Paradoxa in Fox},
      YEAR = {1999},
      BOOKTITLE = {Constraints and Resources in Natural Language Syntax and Semantics},
      EDITOR = {Bouma, Gosse and Hinrichs, Erhard and Kruijff, Geert-Jan M. and Oehrle, Richard T.},
      SERIES = {Studies in Constraint-Based Lexicalism},
      ADDRESS = {Stanford},
      PUBLISHER = {CSLI Publications},
      URL = {https://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/~crysmann/},
      ABSTRACT = {In this paper, I shall discuss an apparent paradox in the morphology and syntax of Fox (Mesquakie) complex verbs. In Fox, verbs can be modified by one or more of a variety of preverbs including modals, aspectuals, manner adverbials, numerals, quantifiers, as well as preverbs which increase the valence of the main verb (Dahlstrom, 1997a). While preverb and verb can be separated by words, phrases, or even embedded sentences, suggesting a status as syntactically independent words, in ection (cf. Dahlstrom, 1997a) and derivation (cf. Ackerman and LeSourd, 1994) appear to treat preverb-verb complexes as a single morphological unit. Following the basic assumptions of lexicalist syntax, I claim that Fox preverb-verb combinations are indeed morphologically derived and that inflectional affixes are attached to complex morphological objects in the word-formation component already. In order to account for the syntactic effects, I propose an analysis in Linearisation HPSG (Reape, 1994, Kathol, 1995), which builds on the assumption that Fox preverb-verb complexes introduce more than one domain object into syntax (cf. Kathol, 1996 for German, Crysmann, 1997 for European Portuguese). Further morphological material will then be distributed across preverb and verb by imposing partial morphological (order) constraints on PHON-values.}
}

@InProceedings{De Kuthy_Meurers:1998,
      AUTHOR = {De Kuthy, Kordula and Meurers, Detmar},
      TITLE = {Towards a General Theory of a Partial Constituent Fronting in German},
      YEAR = {1998},
      BOOKTITLE = {Proceedings of the 10th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information (ESSLLI'98). Joint Conference on Formal Grammar, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, and Categorial Grammar (FHCG '98), August 17-28},
      PAGES = {113-124},
      EDITOR = {Bouma, Gosse and Kruijff, Geert-Jan M. and Oehrle, Richard T.},
      ADDRESS = {Saarbrücken, Germany},
      URL = {ftp://lt-ftp.dfki.uni-sb.de/pub/papers/local/De_Kuthy98b.ps.gz},
      ABSTRACT = {In this paper, we discuss and compare the partial constituents of three different categories (partial APs, NPs, and VPs) and develop an HPSG theory which accounts for the observable similarities and differences in the three sets of data. We show that a generalized argument raising account makes the correct predictions, in particular regarding the observable word order and the interaction in complex fronting phenomena involving topicalized (P)VPs with partial complements. With respect to the theoretical consequences of the partial fronting data, we believe that the reanalysis-like theory we propose provides a concrete basis for a reevaluation of the choice between remnant movement and reanalysis.},
      ANNOTE = {COLIURL : Kuthy:1998:TGT.pdf Kuthy:1998:TGT.ps}
}

@Article{van Noord_et_al:1999,
      AUTHOR = {van Noord, Gertjan and Bouma, Gosse and Koeling, Rob and Nederhof, Mark-Jan},
      TITLE = {Robust Grammatical Analysis for Spoken Dialogue Systems},
      YEAR = {1999},
      JOURNAL = {Natural Language Engineering},
      VOLUME = {5},
      NUMBER = {1},
      PAGES = {45-93},
      URL = {http://odur.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/papers/nle/},
      ABSTRACT = {We argue that grammatical analysis is a viable alternative to concept spotting for processing spoken input in a practical spoken dialogue system. We discuss the structure of the grammar, and a model for robust parsing which combines linguistic sources of information and statistical sources of information. We discuss test results suggesting that grammatical processing allows fast and accurate processing of spoken input.}
}

@Article{YaoBou2012,
      AUTHOR = {Yao, Xuchen and Bouma, Gosse and Zhang, Yi},
      TITLE = {Semantics-based question generation and implementation},
      YEAR = {2012},
      JOURNAL = {Dialogue & discourse},
      VOLUME = {3},
      NUMBER = {2},
      PAGES = {11-42},
      NOTE = {HU}
}