%
% GENERATED FROM https://www.coli.uni-saarland.de
%    by   : anonymous
%    IP   : coli2006.lst.uni-saarland.de
%    at   : Mon, 05 Feb 2024 15:42:41 +0100 GMT
%    
% Selection : Author: Erhard_Hinrichs
%




@InCollection{Crysmann:1999_1,
      AUTHOR = {Crysmann, Berthold},
      TITLE = {Morphosyntactic Paradoxa in Fox},
      YEAR = {1999},
      BOOKTITLE = {Constraints and Resources in Natural Language Syntax and Semantics},
      EDITOR = {Bouma, Gosse and Hinrichs, Erhard and Kruijff, Geert-Jan M. and Oehrle, Richard T.},
      SERIES = {Studies in Constraint-Based Lexicalism},
      ADDRESS = {Stanford},
      PUBLISHER = {CSLI Publications},
      URL = {https://www.coli.uni-saarland.de/~crysmann/},
      ABSTRACT = {In this paper, I shall discuss an apparent paradox in the morphology and syntax of Fox (Mesquakie) complex verbs. In Fox, verbs can be modified by one or more of a variety of preverbs including modals, aspectuals, manner adverbials, numerals, quantifiers, as well as preverbs which increase the valence of the main verb (Dahlstrom, 1997a). While preverb and verb can be separated by words, phrases, or even embedded sentences, suggesting a status as syntactically independent words, in ection (cf. Dahlstrom, 1997a) and derivation (cf. Ackerman and LeSourd, 1994) appear to treat preverb-verb complexes as a single morphological unit. Following the basic assumptions of lexicalist syntax, I claim that Fox preverb-verb combinations are indeed morphologically derived and that inflectional affixes are attached to complex morphological objects in the word-formation component already. In order to account for the syntactic effects, I propose an analysis in Linearisation HPSG (Reape, 1994, Kathol, 1995), which builds on the assumption that Fox preverb-verb complexes introduce more than one domain object into syntax (cf. Kathol, 1996 for German, Crysmann, 1997 for European Portuguese). Further morphological material will then be distributed across preverb and verb by imposing partial morphological (order) constraints on PHON-values.}
}

@InProceedings{Holloway King_et_al:2000,
      AUTHOR = {Holloway King, Tracy and Dipper, Stefanie and Frank, Anette and Kuhn, Jonas and Maxwell, John},
      TITLE = {Ambiguity Management in Grammar Writing},
      YEAR = {2000},
      BOOKTITLE = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Linguistic Theory and Grammar Implementation (ESSLLI-2000)},
      PAGES = {5-19},
      EDITOR = {Hinrichs, Erhard and Meurers, Detmar and Wintner, Shuly},
      ADDRESS = {Birmingham, UK},
      URL = {http://www.dfki.de/~frank/papers/ESSLLI00-Dipperetal.ps.gz},
      ABSTRACT = {When lingusitically motivated grammars are implemented on a larger scale, and applied toreal-life corpora, keeping track of ambiguity sources becomes a difficult task. Yet it is of great importance, since unintended ambiguities arising from underrestricted rules or interactions haveto be distinguished from linguistically warranted ambiguities. In this paper we report on various tools in the XLE grammar development platform which can be used for ambiguity managementin grammar writing. In particular, we look at packed representations of ambiguities that allow the grammar writer to view sorted descriptions of ambiguity sources. Also discussed are tools forspecifying desired tree structures and for cutting down the solution space prior to parsing.},
      NOTE = {Revised and extended version to appear 2002 in: Special issue of the Journal of Language and Computation},
      ANNOTE = {COLIURL : King:2000:AMG.pdf King:2000:AMG.ps}
}

@InProceedings{Müller:2000,
      AUTHOR = {Müller, Stefan},
      TITLE = {Continuous or Discontinuous Constituents},
      YEAR = {2000},
      BOOKTITLE = {Proceedings of the ESSLLI'00 Workshop on Linguistic Theory and Grammar Implementation, August 6-18},
      PAGES = {133-152},
      EDITOR = {Hinrichs, Erhard and Meurers, Detmar and Wintner, Shuly},
      ADDRESS = {Birmingham},
      URL = {http://www.dfki.de/~stefan/PS/esslli00.ps},
      ABSTRACT = {In diesem Aufsatz diskutiere ich verschiedene HPSG-Ansätze zur Beschreibung der Konstituentenstellung im Deutschen. Ansätze, die von kontinuierlichen Konstituenten ausgehen, werden mit einem Ansatz, der diskontinuierliche Konstituenten annimmt, verglichen. Die Anzahl der passiven Kanten, die beim Parsen von 24.602 Äußerungen aus dem Verbmobil-Korpus von der Verbmobil-Grammatik erzeugt werden, werden mit der Anzahl der passiven Kanten verglichen, die die Babel-Grammatik erzeugt In this paper I discuss several possibile analyses for constituent order in German. Approaches that assume continuous constituents are compared with an approach that assumes discontinuous constituents. I will show that certain proposals that have been made to analyze constituent order are either not adequate or cannot be implemented with currently availible systems. For the proposals that can be implementd I will discuss the amount of work a parser has to do. I then compare two implementations of larger fragments of German: the Verbmobil grammar and the Babel grammar. It is shown that the amount of work to be done to parse the Verbmobil grammar is significantly higher then the work that has to be done parsing with the Babel grammar.},
      ANNOTE = {COLIURL : Muller:2000:CDC.pdf Muller:2000:CDC.ps}
}

@InProceedings{BrDeHiPiRoCaWi2008,
      AUTHOR = {Broeder, Daan and Declerck, Thierry and Hinrichs, Erhard and Piperidis, Stelios and Romary, Laurent and Calzolari, Nicoletta and Wittenburg, Peter},
      TITLE = {Foundation of a component-based flexible registry for Llanguage resources and Technology},
      YEAR = {2008},
      BOOKTITLE = {Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation : LREC 2008, May 26 - June 1, 2008, Palais des congrès Mansour Eddahbi, Marrakech, Morocco},
      PAGES = {1433-1436},
      ADDRESS = {Paris},
      ORGANIZATION = {ELRA},
      NOTE = {HU}
}