%
% GENERATED FROM https://www.coli.uni-saarland.de
%    by   : anonymous
%    IP   : coli2006.lst.uni-saarland.de
%    at   : Mon, 05 Feb 2024 15:43:10 +0100 GMT
%    
% Selection : Author: Detmar_Meurers
%




@InProceedings{De Kuthy:1998,
      AUTHOR = {De Kuthy, Kordula},
      TITLE = {Splitting PP Arguments from NPs - An Argument Raising Approach and its Interaction with Lexical Semantics},
      YEAR = {1998},
      BOOKTITLE = {Workshop of the 10th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information (ESSLLI '98): Current Topics in Constraint-Based Germanic Syntax, August 17-28},
      PAGES = {49-64},
      EDITOR = {Kiss, Tibor and Meurers, Detmar},
      ADDRESS = {Saarbrücken, Germany},
      URL = {ftp://lt-ftp.dfki.uni-sb.de/pub/papers/local/De_Kuthy98c.ps.gz ftp://lt-ftp.dfki.uni-sb.de/pub/papers/local/De_Kuthy98c.entry},
      ANNOTE = {COLIURL : Kuthy:1998:SPA.pdf Kuthy:1998:SPA.ps}
}

@InProceedings{De Kuthy_Meurers:1998,
      AUTHOR = {De Kuthy, Kordula and Meurers, Detmar},
      TITLE = {Towards a General Theory of a Partial Constituent Fronting in German},
      YEAR = {1998},
      BOOKTITLE = {Proceedings of the 10th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information (ESSLLI'98). Joint Conference on Formal Grammar, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, and Categorial Grammar (FHCG '98), August 17-28},
      PAGES = {113-124},
      EDITOR = {Bouma, Gosse and Kruijff, Geert-Jan M. and Oehrle, Richard T.},
      ADDRESS = {Saarbrücken, Germany},
      URL = {ftp://lt-ftp.dfki.uni-sb.de/pub/papers/local/De_Kuthy98b.ps.gz},
      ABSTRACT = {In this paper, we discuss and compare the partial constituents of three different categories (partial APs, NPs, and VPs) and develop an HPSG theory which accounts for the observable similarities and differences in the three sets of data. We show that a generalized argument raising account makes the correct predictions, in particular regarding the observable word order and the interaction in complex fronting phenomena involving topicalized (P)VPs with partial complements. With respect to the theoretical consequences of the partial fronting data, we believe that the reanalysis-like theory we propose provides a concrete basis for a reevaluation of the choice between remnant movement and reanalysis.},
      ANNOTE = {COLIURL : Kuthy:1998:TGT.pdf Kuthy:1998:TGT.ps}
}

@InProceedings{De Kuthy_Meurers:1999,
      AUTHOR = {De Kuthy, Kordula and Meurers, Detmar},
      TITLE = {Argument Raising Meets Adjuncts-as-Dependents and Traceless Extraction},
      YEAR = {1999},
      BOOKTITLE = {6th International Conference on HPSG, August 4-6},
      PAGES = {45-50},
      ADDRESS = {Edinburgh, Scotland},
      URL = {http://ling.osu.edu/~dm/papers/dekuthy-meurers-hpsg99.ps.gz},
      ANNOTE = {COLIURL : Kuthy:1999:ARM.pdf Kuthy:1999:ARM.ps}
}

@InProceedings{Holloway King_et_al:2000,
      AUTHOR = {Holloway King, Tracy and Dipper, Stefanie and Frank, Anette and Kuhn, Jonas and Maxwell, John},
      TITLE = {Ambiguity Management in Grammar Writing},
      YEAR = {2000},
      BOOKTITLE = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Linguistic Theory and Grammar Implementation (ESSLLI-2000)},
      PAGES = {5-19},
      EDITOR = {Hinrichs, Erhard and Meurers, Detmar and Wintner, Shuly},
      ADDRESS = {Birmingham, UK},
      URL = {http://www.dfki.de/~frank/papers/ESSLLI00-Dipperetal.ps.gz},
      ABSTRACT = {When lingusitically motivated grammars are implemented on a larger scale, and applied toreal-life corpora, keeping track of ambiguity sources becomes a difficult task. Yet it is of great importance, since unintended ambiguities arising from underrestricted rules or interactions haveto be distinguished from linguistically warranted ambiguities. In this paper we report on various tools in the XLE grammar development platform which can be used for ambiguity managementin grammar writing. In particular, we look at packed representations of ambiguities that allow the grammar writer to view sorted descriptions of ambiguity sources. Also discussed are tools forspecifying desired tree structures and for cutting down the solution space prior to parsing.},
      NOTE = {Revised and extended version to appear 2002 in: Special issue of the Journal of Language and Computation},
      ANNOTE = {COLIURL : King:2000:AMG.pdf King:2000:AMG.ps}
}

@InProceedings{Müller:2000,
      AUTHOR = {Müller, Stefan},
      TITLE = {Continuous or Discontinuous Constituents},
      YEAR = {2000},
      BOOKTITLE = {Proceedings of the ESSLLI'00 Workshop on Linguistic Theory and Grammar Implementation, August 6-18},
      PAGES = {133-152},
      EDITOR = {Hinrichs, Erhard and Meurers, Detmar and Wintner, Shuly},
      ADDRESS = {Birmingham},
      URL = {http://www.dfki.de/~stefan/PS/esslli00.ps},
      ABSTRACT = {In diesem Aufsatz diskutiere ich verschiedene HPSG-Ansätze zur Beschreibung der Konstituentenstellung im Deutschen. Ansätze, die von kontinuierlichen Konstituenten ausgehen, werden mit einem Ansatz, der diskontinuierliche Konstituenten annimmt, verglichen. Die Anzahl der passiven Kanten, die beim Parsen von 24.602 Äußerungen aus dem Verbmobil-Korpus von der Verbmobil-Grammatik erzeugt werden, werden mit der Anzahl der passiven Kanten verglichen, die die Babel-Grammatik erzeugt In this paper I discuss several possibile analyses for constituent order in German. Approaches that assume continuous constituents are compared with an approach that assumes discontinuous constituents. I will show that certain proposals that have been made to analyze constituent order are either not adequate or cannot be implemented with currently availible systems. For the proposals that can be implementd I will discuss the amount of work a parser has to do. I then compare two implementations of larger fragments of German: the Verbmobil grammar and the Babel grammar. It is shown that the amount of work to be done to parse the Verbmobil grammar is significantly higher then the work that has to be done parsing with the Babel grammar.},
      ANNOTE = {COLIURL : Muller:2000:CDC.pdf Muller:2000:CDC.ps}
}

@InCollection{Müller:2001,
      AUTHOR = {Müller, Stefan},
      TITLE = {Case in German - Towards an HPSG-Analysis},
      YEAR = {2001},
      BOOKTITLE = {Constraint-Based Approaches to Germanic Syntax},
      VOLUME = {7},
      PAGES = {217-255},
      EDITOR = {Kiss, Tibor and Meurers, Detmar},
      SERIES = {Studies in Constraint-Based Lexicalism},
      ADDRESS = {Stanford},
      PUBLISHER = {CSLI},
      URL = {http://www.dfki.de/~stefan/PS/csli-case.ps.gz},
      ABSTRACT = {In Tibor Kiss and Detmar Meurers (Eds): Constraint-based Approaches to Germanic Syntax, Studies in Constraint-Based Lexicalism, No. 7. Stanford: CSLI-Publications, pages 217-255. The case theory that is developed in the paper builds on work done by Heinz and Matiasek (1994). Their approach is improved in such a way that case assignent in coherent constructions like (1) works properly. (1) Er sieht den Mann den Wagen reparieren. he sees the manacc the caracc repair 'He sees the man repairing the car.' With the type hierarchy of Heinz and Matiasek it is impossible to describe the phenomenon Kongruenzkasus. Sentences like (2) and (3) cannot be analyzed. (2) a. Sie nannte ihn einen Lügner. She called himacc a liaracc b. Er wurde ein Lügner genannt. henom was a liarnom called 'He was called a liar.' (3) a. Ich sehe ihn als meinen Freund an. I see himacc as my friendacc PRFX 'I regard him as my friend.' b. Er wird als mein Freund angesehen. In the paper, I propose a more structured case feature and appropriate lexical entries to analyze these sentences. Apart from that it is explained how the case assignment in adjectival and participal environments works and the case assignment to non-realized subjects as in (4) will be explaind. (4) Ich habe den Männern erlaubt, einer nach dem anderen wegzulaufen.},
      ANNOTE = {COLIURL : Muller:2001:CGT.pdf Muller:2001:CGT.ps}
}